Talk:Boeing 737

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Boeing 737 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4: 365 days

Boeing 737 was a Engineering and technology good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
January 23, 2015	Good article nominee	Not listed
March 14, 2016	Good article nominee	Not listed
April 13, 2021	Good article nominee	Not listed
Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on April 9, 2009, April 9, 2012, April 9, 2015, April 9, 2017, and April 9, 2021.
Current status: Former good article nominee

Lion Air Flight 386 was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 23 December 2013 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Boeing 737. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

Aviation: Aircraft

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

This article has failed an A-Class review.

This article has had a peer review which is now archived.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[CFM International CFM56#CFM56-3B-1|CFM56-3]]

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Infobox aircraft replacing Aircraft begin and type

@Fnlayson per the top of the Infobox aircraft begin and Infobox aircraft type, they’re both being merged with Infobox aircraft. Professional Adriazeri (talk) 20:13, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Where is the consensus for such a change? -Fnlayson (talk) 20:56, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Here: Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion Professional Adriazeri (talk) 21:04, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Use mdy dates or Use MDY dates template

@Fnlayson: Hi, apologies if there's any other reason for it, but I believe that {{Use MDY dates}} redirects to {{Use mdy dates}} anyway, and so I'm unaware of any particular reason that the template wouldn't work - and yes, I did check in the edit preview to make sure that it was a valid template. Similar to how {{cn}} works in place of {{Citation needed}}. Fork99 (talk) 02:07, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh and for further context for anyone else reading this, this was intended as a dummy edit in order to make a WP:CWW attribution edit summary. Fork99 (talk) 02:10, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, sorry. That seemed like a fruitless edit and didn't think about a dummy edit then. Thanks -Fnlayson (talk) 14:34, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]